翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ City of Portland (train) ・ City of Portland (Victoria) ・ City of Portland IV ・ City of Poughkeepsie Transit ・ City of Prague Philharmonic Orchestra ・ City of Prahran ・ City of Preston ・ City of Preston (Victoria) ・ City of Preston, Lancashire ・ City of Prineville Railway ・ City of Prospect ・ City of Quartz ・ City of Queanbeyan ・ City of Quincy v. Jackson ・ City of Racine Fire Department ・ City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams ・ City of Randwick ・ City of Redcliffe ・ City of Refuge ・ City of Refuge (Abigail Washburn album) ・ City of Refuge (album) ・ City of Refuge (Atlanta) ・ City of regional significance (Ukraine) ・ City of republic significance ・ City of Richmond ・ City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co. ・ City of Richmond v. United States ・ City of Ringwood ・ City of Rochester Symphony Orchestra ・ City of Rochester-upon-Medway Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams ： ウィキペディア英語版 City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams ''City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams'', 544 U.S. 113 (2005), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that the Telecommunications Act (TCA) precluded damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 because it provided a comprehensive remedial scheme. ''Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams'' is a part of the Sea Clammers Doctrine line of cases. == Background == Mark Abrams owned property in a residential neighborhood in Rancho Palos Verdes, California. His property was located at a high elevation, near the peak of the Rancho Palos Verdes Peninsula, which was ideal for radio transmissions. In 1989, Abrams obtained a permit to construct a 52.5 foot antenna on his property for amateur use. In 1998, Abrams sought permission to construct a second antenna tower, but in the course of investigating the application the city learned Abrams was using his antennas for commercial purposes. This was in violation of a city ordinance requiring a conditional use permit for commercial antenna use. In July 1999, Abrams sought the requisite conditional use permit, but his neighbors provided strong opposition. In August 2000, Abrams filled action against Rancho Palos Verdes in the District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that the denial of the conditional use permit violated the limitations placed on the city's zoning authority by the Telecommunications Act. Abrams sought injunctive relief under the Telecommunications Act and money damages and attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 42 U.S.C. § 1988. The district court ordered the city to grant Abram's application for a conditional use permit, but refused the request for money damages and attorney's fees. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed on the latter point, and remanded for determination of money damages and attorney's fees.〔City of Rancho Palos Verdes, Cal. v. Abrams, F.3d 1094 (2004).〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.